Everyday Mathematics
Everyday Mathematics is a pre-K and elementary school mathematics curriculum developed by the University of Chicago School Mathematics Project.
The program is published by the Wright Group of the McGraw-Hill Publishing. One of the textbooks used at the national level for mathematics teaching and also text. It describes the mathematics in the traditional storage methods but with less mathematical problems, many practical methods and a constructive approach of 'teaching math. More than 3 million students in 185,000 classrooms in the U.S., who are currently using Everyday Mathematics.
Brief history of book
The introduction above demonstrates astonishing bias that could be mitigated by professionals using the curriculum as part of a well-developed school mathematics program, despite continual protests by parents who are confused by its dissimilarity to the mathematics curricula to which they were exposed as children. A school's burden is to educate parents so that they understand, rather than fear, an emphasis on conceptual mathematics with which children are typically more engaged and comfortable than their parents.
Everyday Mathematics curriculum was developed by the University of Chicago Project (or UCSMP )[1] which was founded in 1983.
Work on it started in the summer of 1985. The 1st edition, released in 1998 and the 2nd edition, released in 2002. A third edition was released in 2007 .[2] Almost as soon as the first edition was released, it became part of a nationwide controversy over reform mathematics. In October 1999, US Department of Education issued a report labeling Everyday Mathematics as one of five "promising" new math programs.[3] The perceived endorsement of Everyday Mathematics and a number of other textbooks by an agency of the US government caused such outrage among practicing mathematicians and scientists that a group of them drafted an open letter to then Secretary of Education Richard Riley urging him to withdraw the report. The letter [4] appeared in the November 18, 1999 edition of the Post and was eventually signed by over two hundred prominent mathematicians and scientists including four Nobel Laureates [5] , has since become Secretary of Energy and three Fields Medalists, a National Medal of Science winner from the University of Chicago, and the some chairs of math departments.[6] The debate has continued at the state and local level as school districts across the country consider the adoption of Everyday Math. Two states where the controversy has attracted national attention are California and Texas. California has one of the most rigorous textbook adoption processes and in January 2001 rejected Everyday Mathematics for failing to meet state content standards.[7] Everyday Math stayed off the California textbook lists until 2007 when the publisher released a California version of the 3rd edition that is supplemented with more traditional arithmetic ,[8] reigniting debate at the local level.[9] In late 2007, the Texas State Board of Education took the unusual step of rejecting the 3rd edition of Everyday Math [10] after earlier editions had been in use in more than 70 districts across the state. The fact that they singled out Everyday Math while approving all 162 other books and educational materials raised questions about the board's legal powers.[11]
Application
Below is an outline of the components of EM as they are generally seen throughout the curriculum.
- Lessons
A typical lesson outlined in one of the teacher’s manuals includes three parts[12]
- Teaching the Lesson—Provides main instructional activities for the lesson.
- Ongoing Learning and Practice—Supports previously introduced concepts and skills; essential for maintaining skills.
- Differentiation Options—Includes options for supporting the needs of all students; usually an extension of Part 1, Teaching the Lesson.
- Daily Routines
Every day, there are certain things that each EM lesson requires the student to do routinely. These components can be dispersed throughout the day or they can be part of the main math lesson.
- Math Messages—These are problems, displayed in a manner chosen by the teacher, that students complete before the lesson and then discuss as an opener to the main lesson.
- Mental Math and Reflexes—These are brief (no longer than 5 min) sessions “…designed to strengthen children's number sense and to review and advance essential basic skills…” (Program Components 2003).
- Math Boxes—These are pages intended to have students routinely practice problems independently.
- Home Links/Study Links—Everyday homework is sent home. Grades K-3 they are called Home Links and 4-6 they are Study Links. They are meant to reinforce instruction as well as connect home to the work at school.
- Supplemental Aspects
Beyond the components already listed, there are supplemental resources to the program. The two most common are games and explorations.
- Games—These are counted as an essential part of the EM curriculum. “…Everyday Mathematics sees games as enjoyable ways to practice number skills, especially those that help children develop fact power…” (Program Components 2003). Therefore, authors of the series have interwoven games throughout daily lessons and activities. Some commonly played games in the series are *
- Games only include
- Addition Top It This is when two to three students use a deck of playing cards (0-10). The cards are shuffled and the deck is placed in the middle of the players. Each player takes two cards and adds them together. The player with the highest sum wins that round and takes the other players cards. The game is over when there are not enough cards left for each person to pull two cards. The person with the most cards at the end of the game wins.
- Beat the Calculator Three students play in groups - one player is the "caller," a second player is the "calculator," and the third is the "brain." The game begins by the "caller" selecting a fact problem by using a deck of playing cards (0-9). That person selects two cards and creates an equation using the two numbers on the cards. The "calculator" then solves the problem with a calculator as the "brain" solves it without a calculator. Students try to race each other to get the correct answer first to the equation. The "caller" decides who got the answer first and that person wins that round. The players trade roles every 3–5 minutes depending on how much time is available.
- Explorations—One could, perhaps, best describe these as mini-projects completed in small groups. They are intended to extend upon concepts taught throughout the year.
Instead of fostering a competitive environment and teaching students through logical deduction, Everyday Mathematics uses a collaborative milieu and allows students to draw their own conclusions after seeing recurring math patterns.
Scientific evidence
What Works Clearinghouse ( or WWC ) [13] reviewed the evidence in support of the Everyday Mathematics program. Of the 61 pieces of evidence submitted by the publisher, 57 did not meet the WWC minimum standards for scientific evidence, four met evidence standards with reservations, and one of those four showed a statistically significant positive effect. Based on the four studies considered, the WWC gave Everyday Math a rating of "Potentially Positive Effect" with the four studies showing a mean improvement in elementary math achievement (versus unspecified alternative programs) of 6 percentile rank points with a range of -7 to +14 percentile rank points, on a scale from -50 to +50.[14][15]
Notes
- ^ Chicago educational- retrieved in 2004
- ^ Max Bell was Project Director and James McBride was Project Director
- ^ Jackson, A.;Notices of the American Mathematical Society,2000
- ^ letter for everyday maths-URL consulted
- ^ quoted by Steven Chu , Nobel
- ^ departments : at Caltech, Cornell, Stanford, UC Irvine, University of Maryland, University of Rochester, University of Wisconsin, and Yale University
- ^ California State Board of Education 2001 Mathematics Adoption Report, January 2001 [1] Retrieved April 19, 2009
- ^ California State Board of Education 2007 Mathematics Primary Adoption Report, (2008)- Url retrieved April 19, 2009
- ^ quote by Samuels,D,2009-04- 14, "Palo Alto school-URL retrieved April 19, 2009
- ^ State Board of Education Summary of Action Items, November 16, 2007 [2] Retrieved April 19, 2009
- ^ Smith, K, (2008-01-16) "Rejection of math textbook sparks debate on state board's authority", Dallas Morning News, Retrieved April 19, 2009.
- ^ Example of typical lesson online- retrieved in April 2009
- ^ WWC: is a database math interventions prepared by a contractor for the U.S. Department of Education)
- ^ Interpretation: An average (50th percentile rank) student taught with Everyday Math could be expected to perform on average as well on the measurements used in the various studies as a student in one of the comparison programs performing at the 56th percentile rank
- ^ What Works Clearinghouse Intervention Report on Everyday Mathematics, updated April 2007 - retrieved 2009-04-11
- topics of works
- About Everyday Mathematics: Research & Development. (2003) Retrieved June 27, 2006.
- Bas, Braams. (2003) Spiraling Through UCSMP Everyday Mathematics. Retrieved June 27, 2006.
- Current Curriculum: About Everyday Mathematics. (2002) Retrieved June 27, 2006.
- Knight, Michelle. (2005) Everyday Math Has Its Proponents. Retrieved June 27, 2006.
- Foundations for Success, The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008) U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved April 19, 2009
- Johnson, Jerry. (2000) Teaching and Learning Mathematics: Using Research to Shift from “Yesterday” Mind to “Tomorrow” Mind. Retrieved June 27, 2006.
- Program Components for Grades 1-6. (2003) Retrieved June 27, 2006.
- University of Chicago School Mathematics Project. (2005) . Retrieved June 29, 2006.
- Wertheimer, Richard. (2002) Forum: Making It All Add Up. Retrieved June 29, 2006.
External links